United
Airlines has leapt into a brand disaster of mythic proportions. In a scandal
that’s still evolving quickly, the company’s employees had Chicago Department of
Aviation officers forcefully remove a passenger — a paying customer sitting in
his seat — from an overbooked flight. Around the world, people watched a video
of the bloodied man being dragged down the aisle. The company’s stock lost
hundreds of millions of market cap, but the damage to the brand (and future
sales) may be far higher.

The
incident, along with some other recent brand missteps, highlight some basic
realities about the world companies operate in today. Three themes seem
critical.
The
speed of shame is as fast (and as ruthless) as the internet. When will
companies realize that everyone now
has a video camera on them, and that they can broadcast live on Facebook within
minutes? People can now destroy brand trust at the speed of light, with
consequences that are far-reaching. For example, in China, a critical growth
market for the airlines, the disturbing passenger-shot video story has gone
super-viral (likely in part because the passenger manhandled by United was
Asian). It was the number one topic on Weibo, China’s version of Twitter, with
100 million views. And while it’s way too early to predict the financial damage
in that country or more broadly, the brand will likely keep taking hits for a
while — other stories about being mistreated by United are getting airtime and
countless people are pledging to stop flying United.
Yet
United is far from the only company to experience instantaneous negative
reactions recently. Last week, PepsiCo ran — and then quickly pulled — an
advertisement showing the model Kendall Jenner breaking through a line of
protesters (who looked more like they were at a dance party) to hand a Pepsi to
a police officer. Jenner’s offering of 12-ounces of peace and love seemingly
solves all of society’s tensions. The backlash, especially from those who saw a
jarringly off-note take on Black Lives Matter protests, was justified — and
unbelievably fast. Has there ever been a major ad that debuted and was pulled in
less than 24 hours?
In both
cases, word spread partly though dark humor, which raced around Twitter,
Facebook, and newscasts, including a map of a United plane with a section
labeled “Fight Club.” And Saturday Night Live’s brilliant take on Pepsi captured
the essence of what was likely a well-intentioned effort. SNL gave us an
imagined conversation between the ad’s creator and his family (unseen on the
other end of a phone call, like an old-school Bob Newhart routine). His dawning
realization that he’s made a big mistake is comedy gold. Humor plays a big role
in stories going viral and, in cases like these, it may help people cope with
upsetting images. But it doesn’t do the brands any favors.
Everyone
expects an apology —
and a real one. Pepsi got this right. The company acted quickly and owned
the error. As a spokesperson said, “Pepsi was trying to project a global message
of unity, peace, and understanding. Clearly, we missed the mark, and we
apologize.”
United,
on the other hand, has had a rough couple of days. The first statement from
Oscar Munoz, the United CEO, was just bizarre, focusing on his employees while
also using an awful euphemism for violently pulling someone off a plane: “This
is an upsetting event to all of us here at United. I apologize for having to
re-accommodate these customers.”
What’s
different today is that everyone can
feel personally engaged in what your company does to anyone.
In Munoz’ first statement, he went on to say, “we are reaching out to this
passenger to talk directly to him and resolve this situation.” That’s fine, but
CEOs today need to “reach out” to the public, too. At the very least every
passenger on that plane deserves some direct contact, but now millions of others
want an explanation as well. In our social media dominated world, everybody has
an opinion and feels like they’re owed something.
Munoz
tried to make up for his first statement with numerous public apologies since —
and they’re much better – but the reality is that the first one sticks and is a
very public window into your company’s priorities and soul.
Employees
must feel safe and empowered to speak up. The biggest question I (and
many others) have about these recent brand disasters is this: Why didn’t anyone
in these companies say something before things got out of hand? At Pepsi, there
must have been employees – in the marketing meetings, on the set, or even in the
ad agency – who felt like the unseen family members in the SNL skit. Many knew the
ad was tone-deaf. If they believed they were expected to go beyond following
rules and maximizing performance, United employees would have stepped in to
de-escalate the situation once they realized something was going horribly wrong
on that flight.
Of
course, intentions do matter. In Pepsi’s case, the ad was likely well-meaning,
so chastised execs and the brand will probably recover. United is in a radically
different situation. As with the Wells Fargo and VW scandals before it, the
problem here is a systematic set of expectations and rules, set from the top,
that lead to very bad (and now public) behavior.
Companies
need to think carefully about their policies and their crisis communications, so
they can quickly move from a defensive crouch to honest, heart-felt apologies —
and to real changes in how they operate. But most importantly, they need to
assess whether their cultures allow their own employees the power and safety to
stand in front of the train of fast-moving stupidity and say, “You shall not
pass!” And they need to have executives who will listen to
them.
The big
takeaway here is that expectations about how companies operate — and their very
role in society — are rising fast. Pepsi clearly had some inkling of this; just
think about why the
company wanted to say something about justice and understanding, even if it did
it poorly. United (and its airline peers) had better wake up fast to this new
reality as well.
All
companies now operate in a world that’s closely watching their policies,
actions, and how they handle themselves when things go wrong. When literally
anyone can simultaneously act as a customer, a protester, a critic, and a
muckraking reporter with a video camera, executives have zero room for
error.
SOURCE:
HBR.ORG
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét